More websites to the laser scans of additional stone carvings found
at Stonehenge - together with photos - are found at
http://www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/nwh_gfx_en/ART18464.html
http://www.wessexarch.co.uk/press/stonehenge_lasers.html
The press release at the Wessex Archaeology site above writes
"The Stonehenge Laser Scan website at
http://www.stonehengelaserscan.org/ [referred to in the originial
article previously posted] is currently down. A temporary
alternative may be found at http://stonehenge.archaeoptics.co.uk/
My general comment to the laser scans of the carved axes:
While I am thrilled that laser scan technology is beginning to show
carvings on the stones that I can see with the naked eye and have
long before this high-tech innovation came to the fore, please note
that what you read in those articles from the still-ever clueless
and "ritually-oriented" archaeologists about the meaning of the
carvings is of course nonsense.
As Eusebius said about the pyramids and the lists of the ancient
Pharaonic kings, which also applies to Stonehenge, "it is all
astronomy". Religious rituals and rites are in the clouded heads of
modern-day esoterics and day-dreamers, some of whom appear to staff
the archaeological faculties of this world.
Look at the beautifully carved very large profile of a head (nose to
the left) carved on the right-hand stone of the home page of
archaeoptics
http://www.archaeoptics.co.uk/
- who are doing the laser-scanning.
Do they see this yet - NO - they are oblivious. Lasers and all.
They are STILL unable to see what is directly in front of their
noses (and) retinas.
Hah!
High-Tech indeed. The discovery of carvings on megaliths is not
mainstream archaeology's to claim. They have been asleep on their
well-padded behinds for centuries. Rather, I have seen the carvings
on the stones long before them. What mainstream archaeology should
do is bow its head in shame and repent, rather than to lay claim to
discoveries which are NOT theirs.
UPDATE
To the LexiLine files on Ancient Britain at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LexiLine/files/Ancient%20Britain/
I have added
laserfoto1.gif
and
laserfoto2.gif
showing how the photograph on the front page of
http://www.archaeoptics.co.uk/
includes rock carvings which no one needs a laser beam to see....
You just have to LOOK.
On the right hand megalith, reduction of the color picture to a
black and white threshold level of 75% shows the outline of the
profiled head clearly. Note that there are other figures in the
stones as well.
On the left hand megalith, increasing brightness by 50% but also
decreasing brightness by 50% shows that there are also figures on
this megalith.
Anyone who thinks there are only some small daggers laser-sighted on
these stones (and not more figures) is just kidding himself.
We are nevertheless happy and
thankful that they have been discovered, thus further showing that
there are carvings on the megaliths of Stonehenge, but as we have
shown long before the laser discoveries, there are many, greater,
carvings on these stones.
Andreas, you are right that my interpretation of the carving in the
Cheops pyramid secret chamber is speculative - after all, I made it
based on my photograph of the TV picture seen as the chamber was
opened, not an ideal shot, I can assure you. But even Zahi Hawass
first amazed comment was something like "what are those figures?" -
so there are figures there.
My interpretation of them may or may not be correct - we shall see
as Hawass continues the work - he is a sincere man and I am sure he
will do an excellent job of ultimately providing us with definitive
photos and more research of the secret chamber.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most Popular Posts of All Time
-
The Phaistos Disc: An Ancient Enigma Solved - by Andis Kaulins [1] Presented 31 October 2008 at the INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE PHAISTO...
-
The tomb of Senenmut (also written Senmut, both are wrong as we show in the next posting) located as Tomb TT353 at Del el-Bahri, Egypt, has...
-
Writing Origins! This is one my most important postings ever because it is an important step forward in resolving the question of the origin...
-
Who was Tutankhamun and was he murdered by the Philistines? Nearly five years ago I made a posting to the LexiLine group on the History ...
-
I received an email recently alerting me to the fascinating megalithic underwater site of Atlit-Yam in Israel. The Israel Antiquities ...
-
The terms Semite and Semitic were first coined by the German historian August Ludwig von Schlözer only in the modern era in the year 1781...
-
I am still working on my formal write-up of my Gobekli Tepe decipherment which will show that Göbekli Tepe is astronomical in nature and...
-
I received an inquiry relating to Agoza which indicated that I needed to post some more information about it. Agoza is merely the site of an...
-
Turin Canon of Kings to be Revised : More Fragments Discovered THIS IS SENSATIONAL NEWS! Ancient Tides is a nice blog by Gregory LeFever...
LexiLine Journal Archive
-
▼
2003
(148)
-
▼
October
(7)
- Rec del Bosc Languedoc France Planisphere - 231 Le...
- Rameses I Back in Egypt? - 230 LexiLine Journal
- Stars Stones Scholars published - 229 LexiLine Jou...
- English Heritage Audit of Sites - 228 LexiLine Jou...
- Miami Circle ReBuried - More Archaeology Bungling ...
- Lasers uncover Stonehenge secrets - 227A LexiLine ...
- Guardian's Egypt and Giza - 227 LexiLine Journal
-
▼
October
(7)
No comments:
Post a Comment